top of page

Understanding Intestate Succession: Navigating the Legal Landscape in Australia


When a person passes away without a valid will, they are said to have died "intestate". This can lead to complex legal scenarios, particularly in a country with a legal landscape as multifaceted as Australia's. This short little article aims to dissect the intestacy rules in Australia and present a real-life case study to illustrate the potential complexities and outcomes of such situations.

What is Intestacy?

Intestacy refers to the condition of an estate of a person who dies without a valid will. In this scenario, the distribution of the deceased’s assets is not determined by their wishes, but rather by the specific laws of intestacy.

The Legal Framework in Australia

Australia's legal framework for dealing with intestate estates varies across states and territories. However, common principles apply. The administration of the estate is typically undertaken by a court-appointed administrator, often a close relative of the deceased.

Distribution of Assets

The distribution of assets in the event of intestacy is strictly governed by law. Typically, the estate is distributed in the following order of priority:

1. Spouse or Domestic Partner: Receives the majority or entirety of the estate, depending on the presence of children.

2. Children: If there is no surviving partner, the children receive the estate equally.

3. Parents, Siblings, and Other Relatives: In the absence of a partner or children, the estate is distributed to other relatives, with parents being the first in line.

Tax Implications

In Australia, the distribution of an intestate estate can have significant tax implications, particularly regarding superannuation and property assets. These tax burdens can vary significantly based on the structure of the estate and the relationships between the deceased and the beneficiaries.

Case Study: The Estate of John Doe

John Doe, a resident of New South Wales, passed away intestate at the age of 55. He was survived by his wife, Jane Doe, and two adult children from a previous marriage. John owned a family home, shared with Jane, and had a substantial superannuation fund.

The Legal Battle

Following John’s death, a dispute arose between Jane and John’s children. The children argued for an equal share of the estate, including the family home and the superannuation fund. However, under New South Wales law, Jane was entitled to the entirety of the family home and a portion of the remaining assets.

Court Proceedings and Outcome

The matter escalated to the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The court had to consider the provisions of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), specifically relating to intestate estates. After deliberation, the court ruled in favor of Jane Doe, granting her the family home and a significant portion of the remaining assets. The children received the remainder of the estate.

Lessons Learned

This case highlights the complexities and potential disputes arising from intestacy. It underscores the importance of having a valid and updated will, especially in blended family scenarios.


Dying intestate in Australia can lead to unforeseen complications and legal battles among surviving relatives. It’s a stark reminder of the importance of estate planning and the need for a valid will. Individuals should consult with legal professionals to ensure their estate is managed according to their wishes after their passing.

34 views0 comments


bottom of page